Comparing temperaments

Images of tem­pered scales cre­at­ed by the Bol Processor

The fol­low­ing are Bol Processor + Csound inter­pre­ta­tions of J.-S. Bach’s Prelude 1 in C major (1722) and François Couperin’s Les Ombres Errantes (1730) — both near the end of the Baroque peri­od — using tem­pera­ment scales (Asselin 2000). The names and tun­ing pro­ce­dures fol­low Asselin’s instruc­tions (p. 67-126). Images of the scales have been cre­at­ed using the Bol Processor.

The con­struc­tion of these scales with the Bol Processor is explained in detail on the Microtonality page. The com­plete set of scale images is avail­able on this page.

➡ We hope to be able to release bet­ter sound demos upon receipt of a set of well-designed C-sound instru­ments. (“orc” files). My apolo­gies to harp­si­chord play­ers, tuners and designers!

Bach’s Prelude 1 in C major (1722)

This is the first pre­lude in a series called Well-Tempered Clavier by Johann Sebastian Bach. Well-tempered, ok… But which temperament?

Let us begin by lis­ten­ing to the piece in equal tem­pera­ment, the pop­u­lar tun­ing of instru­ments in the elec­tron­ic age. Unlearned musi­cians believe that “well-tempered” is the equiv­a­lent of “equal-tempered.”

Equal tem­pera­ment (p. 123) ➡ Image

Don’t hes­i­tate to click on the “Image” links to see cir­cu­lar graph­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tions of scale inter­vals high­light­ing con­so­nance and dissonance.

The fol­low­ing are tra­di­tion­al tem­pera­ments, each of which was designed at a par­tic­u­lar time to meet the spe­cif­ic require­ments of the musi­cal reper­toire en vogue (Asselin 2000 p. 139-180).

H.A. Kellner’s BACH in 1975 (p. 101) ➡ Image
Barca in 1786 (p. 106) ➡ Image
Bethisy in 1764 (p. 121) ➡ Image
Chaumont in 1696 (p. 109) ➡ Image
Corrette in 1753 (p. 111) ➡ Image
D’Alambert-Rousseau 1752-1767 (p. 119) ➡ Image
Kirnberger II in 1771 (p. 90) ➡ Image
Kirnberger III in 1779 (p. 93) ➡ Image
Marpurg in 1756 (p. 117) ➡ Image
Pure minor thirds in 16th cen­tu­ry (p. 82) ➡ Image
Rameau en do in 1726 (p. 113) ➡ Image
Rameau en sib in 1726 (p. 115) ➡ Image
Sauveur in 1701 (p. 80) ➡ Image
Tartini-Vallotti in mid. 18th cen­tu­ry (p. 104) ➡ Image
Werckmeister III in 1691 (p. 194) ➡ Image
Werckmeister IV in 1691 (p. 96) ➡ Image
Werckmeister V in 1691 (p. 199) ➡ Image
Zarlino in 1558 (p. 85) ➡ Image

The pre­vi­ous exam­ple was Zarlino’s tem­pera­ment, not to be con­fused with the pop­u­lar “nat­ur­al scale” of Zarlino, an exam­ple of just into­na­tion:

Zarlino’s “nat­ur­al scale” ➡ Image
J.S. Bach’s dis­ci­ple Johann Kirnberg (1721-1783) - (source)

J.S. Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier (BWV 846–893) is a col­lec­tion of two sets of pre­ludes and fugues in all 24 major and minor keys, dat­ed 1722. To judge the valid­i­ty of a tun­ing scheme it would be nec­es­sary to lis­ten to all the pieces. Readers impa­tient to know more may be inter­est­ed in a “com­pu­ta­tion­al” approach to the sub­ject, read Bach well-tempered tonal analy­sis and lis­ten to the results on the page The Well-tempered Clavier.

Fortunately, there are his­tor­i­cal clues as to the opti­mal choice: Friedrich Wilhelm Marpurg received infor­ma­tion from Bach’s sons and pupils and Johann Kirnberger, one of these pupils, designed tun­ings that he claimed rep­re­sent­ed his mas­ter’s idea of “well-tempered”.

On the page Tonal analy­sis of musi­cal items we show that the analy­sis of tonal inter­vals tends to sug­gest the choice of Kirnberger III rather than Kirnberger II. However, the tem­pera­ment devised by the French physi­cian Joseph Sauveur in 1701 also seemed to fit bet­ter in terms of melod­ic inter­vals — and indeed it sounds beau­ti­ful… This, in turn, can be chal­lenged by the sys­tem­at­ic match­ing of all the works in books I and II with the tun­ing schemes imple­ment­ed on the Bol Processor — see page Bach well-tempered tonal analy­sis.

François Couperin’s Les Ombres Errantes (1730)

Again, my apolo­gies to harp­si­chord play­ers, tuners and manufacturers!

This piece is from François Couperin’s Quatrième livre pub­lished in 1730 ➡ read the full score (Creative Commons licence CC0 1.0 Universal). We used it to illus­trate the inter­pre­ta­tion of mor­dents when import­ing MusicXML files.

First, lis­ten to an (excel­lent) inter­pre­ta­tion of this work by the harp­si­chord play­er Iddo Bar-Shaï (source: https://youtu.be/DCwkMSTFV_E).

Despite its artis­tic qual­i­ty, this per­for­mance has some dis­so­nant effects, which are part­ly masked by the abun­dance of melod­ic orna­men­ta­tion: mor­dents, trills, etc. Such a depar­ture from the theme of the ‘Ombres errantes’ can­not be attrib­uted to either the com­pos­er or the per­former. It is there­fore legit­i­mate to ques­tion the tun­ing of the instru­ment. To do this, we must focus our atten­tion on tonal­i­ty, even if the sound syn­the­sis seems arti­fi­cial to lis­ten­ers whose atten­tion is focused on tem­po­ral­i­ty, orna­men­ta­tion and sound quality.

As some of the fol­low­ing tem­pera­ments were invent­ed (or doc­u­ment­ed?) after 1730, it is unlike­ly that the com­pos­er used them. Let’s try them all any­way, and find the winner!

Equal tem­pera­ment ➡ Image
H.A. Kellner’s BACH (p. 101) ➡ Image
Barca in 1786 (p. 106) ➡ Image
Bethisy in 1764 (p. 121) ➡ Image
Chaumont in 1696 (p. 109) ➡ Image
Corrette in 1753 (p. 111) ➡ Image
D’Alambert-Rousseau 1752-1767 (p. 119) ➡ Image
Kirnberger II in 1771 (p. 90) ➡ Image
Kirnberger III in 1779 (p. 93) ➡ Image
Marpurg in 1756 (p. 117) ➡ Image
Pure minor thirds in 16th cen­tu­ry (p. 82) ➡ Image
Rameau en do in 1726 (p. 113) ➡ Image
Rameau en sib in 1726 (p. 115) ➡ Image
Sauveur in 1701 (p. 80) ➡ Image
Tartini-Vallotti in mid. 18th cen­tu­ry (p. 104) ➡ Image
Werckmeister III in 1691 (p. 194) ➡ Image
Werckmeister IV in 1691 (p. 96) ➡ Image
Werckmeister V in 1691 (p. 199) ➡ Image
Zarlino in 1558 (p. 85) ➡ Image
Zarlino’s “nat­ur­al scale” ➡ Image
Matching har­mon­ic inter­vals of “Le Petit Rien” with “Rameau en do” tem­pera­ment
(see full image)

The best tem­pera­ment for this piece might be Rameau en sib, which was devised by Couperin’s con­tem­po­rary Jean-Philippe Rameau for musi­cal works with flats in the key sig­na­ture (Asselin, 2000 p. 149) — such as the present one. See the Tonal analy­sis of musi­cal items page for a descrip­tion of a sys­tem­at­ic (auto­mat­ed) analy­sis that con­firms this choice.

We might end up with lis­ten­ing to François Couperin’s Le Petit Rien (Ordre 14e de clavecin in D major, 1722), which has two sharps in the key sig­na­ture, sug­gest­ing the use of a Rameau en do temperament.

This choice is also con­firmed by the method described on the page Tonal analy­sis of musi­cal items.

François Couperin’s “Le Petit Rien” (1722), mm = 80, with a “Rameau en do” tem­pera­ment ➡ Image
Source: MusicXML score by Yvan43

Bernard Bel — 2022

Work in progress

Chapter VIII of Pierre-Yves Asselin’s book (2000 p. 139-180) con­tains exam­ples of musi­cal works that illus­trate the rel­e­vance of spe­cif­ic tem­pera­ments. As the scores of many baroque and clas­si­cal mas­ter­pieces are avail­able in the dig­i­tal for­mat MusicXML, we hope to use Bol Processor’s Importing MusicXML scores to transcode them and play these frag­ments with the sug­gest­ed temperaments.

Despite the lim­i­ta­tions of com­par­ing tem­pera­ments on only two musi­cal exam­ples, the aim of this page is to illus­trate the notion of “per­fec­tion” in sets of tonal inter­vals — and in music in gen­er­al. Read the dis­cus­sion: Just into­na­tion: a gen­er­al frame­work. If noth­ing else, we hope to con­vince the read­er that “equal tem­pera­ment” is not the “per­fect” solution!

Musicians inter­est­ed in con­tin­u­ing this research and relat­ed devel­op­ment can use the beta ver­sion of the Bol Processor BP3 to process musi­cal works and cre­ate new tun­ing pro­ce­dures. Follow the instruc­tions on the Bol Processor ‘BP3’ and its PHP inter­face page to install BP3 and learn its basic oper­a­tion. Download and install Csound from its dis­tri­b­u­tion page.

References

Asselin, P.-Y. Musique et tem­péra­ment. Paris, 1985, repub­lished in 2000: Jobert. Soon avail­able in English.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *